For the following article:
Flynn, P. M., Ridgeway, J. L., Wieland, M. L.,
Williams, M. D., Haas, L. R., Kremers, W. K., & Breitkopf, C. R. (2013).
Primary care utilization and mental health diagnoses among adult patients
requiring interpreters: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(3), 386–391. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2159-5
Post a critique of the research study in which you:
- Evaluate the research questions and hypotheses using the Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist as a guide
- Identify the type of quantitative research design used and explain how the researchers implemented the design
- Analyze alignment among the theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design
Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The article under review is titled “Primary care utilization and mental health diagnoses among adult patients requiring interpreters: A retrospective cohort study.” The study explores the relationship between mental health diagnoses and primary care utilization among adult patients requiring interpreters. This critique evaluates the research questions and hypotheses, the type of quantitative research design, and the alignment among the theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design.
Research Questions and Hypotheses Evaluation:
The research questions and hypotheses checklist was used to evaluate the research questions and hypotheses. The research questions were clear, concise, and focused. The hypotheses were directional, testable, and supported by the literature review. The research questions and hypotheses were specific to the research problem, and the study aimed to provide an in-depth analysis of the relationship between primary care utilization and mental health diagnoses among adult patients requiring interpreters.
Quantitative Research Design:
The research design used in the study was a retrospective cohort design. The researchers used electronic health records to identify patients requiring language interpreters and compiled data on primary care utilization and mental health diagnoses. The study participants were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes and were followed up for one year. The researchers used a conditional logistic regression model to analyze the data.
Alignment Among the Theory, Problem, Purpose, Research Questions, Hypotheses, and Design:
The study’s theory, problem, purpose, research questions, hypotheses, and design were well aligned. The theory was based on the literature review, which identified a gap in research regarding the relationship between primary care utilization and mental health diagnoses among adult patients requiring interpreters. The problem was clearly articulated, and the purpose of the study was to provide an in-depth analysis of this relationship. The research questions and hypotheses were specific to the research problem, and the design was appropriate to test these questions and hypotheses.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights into the relationship between primary care utilization and mental health diagnoses among adult patients requiring interpreters. The research questions and hypotheses were well articulated, the quantitative research design was appropriately implemented, and there was alignment among the theory, problem, purpose, research questions and hypotheses, and design. The study findings have practical implications for healthcare providers and policymakers, particularly in improving mental health access for patients requiring interpreters.
