Please see attached for instructions. There should be 2 submissions.  College of Business | worldwide.erau.edu All rights are

Please see attached for instructions. There should be 2 submissions. 

College of Business |
worldwide.erau.edu

All rights are reserved. The material contained herein is the copyright property of Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114. No part of this material may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written consent of the University
.

External Factor Analysis Summary Guidelines

Here are the guidelines for completing the EFAS table.

External Factors (Column 1)

· Select five strategic opportunities and five strategic threats facing your selected strategic audit company.

· List each of these factors as either opportunities or threats in the appropriate column in the EFAS table.

· Provide a detailed description of each factor.

· If outside information is used in the comments section, then it must be cited and referenced correctly in APA format.

Weight (Column 2)

· The total weight for all of the factors should be
1.00.

· Decide how strategic each of the ten factors is in comparison to each other. As an example, a factor might have a high strategic significance for your company with a weight ranging from .15 to .20. On the other hand, a factor may have little in the way of strategic significance, when compared to the other nine factors, and might have a weight of .05.

Rating (Column 3)

· In this column you are to rate how effective the firm has been in meeting the opportunities and threats, with
5 being the top score for any factor. As an example, if you feel a firm is doing a super job of moving into Asia then give a rating of 5.0.

Weighted Score (Column 4)

· Now multiple the scores you have in Columns 2 and 3 for each factor.

· This will produce a weighted score for each factor.

Comments (Column 5)

· Provide a detailed description reflecting why you gave the rating for each factor.

· If outside information is used in the comments section, then it must be cited and referenced correctly in APA format.

Total Scores

· At the bottom of the matrix record the totals of the Weight Score (Column 2), and Weighted Score (Column 4).

· The
Total Weighted Score should indicate how effective your firm has been in handling its opportunities and threats.

Page 2 of 2

image1.emf

image2.png

image3.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Consider the instructions for drafting the Research Method Rationale section of the Prospectus. Draft a Rationale to support “Diversity in State

Consider the instructions for drafting the Research Method Rationale section of the Prospectus. Draft a Rationale to support “Diversity in State Government Leadership” using qualitative research.    The rationale should be thorough and well-cited, with appropriate scholarly research guides or specific scholarly research you have sourced as a particular method

Instructions in file attached. 1. Go to: h ps://login.pearson.com/v1/piapi/piui/signin?client_id=dN4bOBG0sGO9c9HADrifwQeqma5vjREy&oku rl=h

Instructions in file attached. 1. Go to: h ps://login.pearson.com/v1/piapi/piui/signin?client_id=dN4bOBG0sGO9c9HADrifwQeqma5vjREy&oku rl=h ps:%2F%2Fmycourses.pearson.com%2Fcourse-home&siteid=8313 2. Click on course “QMB4680” 3. On the Le Menu click on “Assignments” 4. Complete – Quiz #2 Ch. 12 – 15 (4 ques ons) 5. DO NOT Submit Quiz Maria Fernandez Highlight

 Considering the diversity in state government leadership and the various ethical issues associated with human subjects research, describe what your

 Considering the diversity in state government leadership and the various ethical issues associated with human subjects research, describe what your target sample subjects might perceive as the risks for participating in your study. Briefly describe the following: Your targeted sample The anticipated risks from the subject’s perspective Your strategies for