Post a 1- to 2-paragraph analysis of three paraphrases of a source passage. In your own words, identify which paraphrase you think is most effective, and explain why. Also, explain why the other paraphrases are less effective and why they may constitute violations of Walden’s academic integrity policy.
Source passage:
“Policymakers are challenged to broaden their outlook of preferred plagiarism prevention measures and look towards those strategies that take into account the reasons students give for their plagiarism in the first place, and to build on the value that most students place upon their personal integrity” (Awdry & Sarre, 2013, p. 45).
Student A’s paraphrase:
Policymakers should broaden their outlook of plagiarism prevention measures by considering the reasons students give for plagiarism and by emphasizing the value most students place on personal integrity.
Student B’s paraphrase:
Education experts should expand their vision of strategies to reduce plagiarism by considering the explanations students give for committing plagiarism and by remembering that most students respect the need for academic integrity (Awdry & Sarre, 2013).
Student C’s paraphrase:
According to Awdry and Sarre (2013), policymakers are challenged to broaden their outlook of preferred plagiarism prevention measures and look towards those strategies that take into account the reasons students give for their plagiarism in the first place, and to build on the value that most students place upon their personal integrity.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The given passage discusses the strategy that policymakers should adopt to prevent plagiarism in academic settings. Three students have paraphrased the passage in their own words, and this prompt asks which of the paraphrases is most effective and why. Additionally, it also requires explaining why the other two paraphrases are less effective and how they could be considered violations of academic integrity policies.
Answer:
Among the three paraphrases, student A’s version is the most effective. Student A has rephrased the given passage well and has used their own words to explain policymakers’ need to broaden their approach toward combating plagiarism. The student has effectively captured the essence of the original text by accurately representing the author’s message.
On the other hand, Student B’s paraphrase is less effective than Student A’s because it misrepresents the source’s message. The usage of “education experts” instead of “policymakers” and the use of the word “remembering” changes the context of the original source. Furthermore, the paraphrase lacks originality and is too similar to the original source.
Lastly, student C’s version is also less effective because it has directly copied the original text without changing the phrases. It is simply a verbatim repetition without giving any personal touch in understanding the source. It can, therefore, be considered a violation of academic integrity because the student has not provided any originality in his/her paraphrase.
